一    I learned some knowledge after reading the second chapter. For example, looking at literature depends on how you look at it and what you learned from it. Literature also has many characteristics like language organization and supplementary levels, separation from the real context, the fictional relationship of the world, and the headline that can be placed on the aesthetic function of language (33) is the correct literature.

At the same time, I also realize that both literary and non-literary works are worth studying because they all have points of inquiry that we can learn. It may not be very comprehensive to explore multiple aspects instead of blindly studying literature. So in short, literature can be understood as a model of historical intelligibility.

Through the following reading, I also found that literature can be understood in many ways:

1 is everything a contemporary society treats literature (22)

2 When language is separated from other contexts and other purposes, it can be interpreted as literature (though it must have some inherent qualities) (26)

3 Literature is to analyze a group and interpret the author may bring these texts (28)

4Literature is an institutional standard. It gives us reason to expect that our monthly result is worthwhile (28)

二    What I cannot help asking is, should we also explore if literary records or theories conflict with non-literary works? Because maybe literary record theory may not be comprehensive and true sometimes?

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.